Note
"Companion document to NDLERF Monograph Series No. 34, 'Developing the capacity and skills for national implementation of a drug law enforcement performance measurement framework'".
Authors are affiliated with: Australian Institute of Criminology; MAXimus Solutions Australia.
"Funded by the National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund, an initiative of the National Drug Strategy".
Résumé
This report is a companion piece to the project’s overall final report (Willis, Homel & Anderson 2010) and covers the following important implementation issues: why we need a DLE performance measurement framework (including the limitations of traditional measures of DLE and the benefits of more robust measures); who is responsible for DLE performance measurement; major steps to developing a sound measurement framework; how long it will take to implement the framework; resourcing; change management issues; future evaluation of the framework; and key challenges for national implementation.
Contenu
1. Background – 1.1. Trial implementation of the framework – 1.2. Feasibility testing of the framework in the field – 2. Why do we need a DLE performance measurement framework? – 2.1. Limitations of traditional measures of national DLE – 2.2. Benefits of appropriate measures of DLE – 3. Who is responsible for performance measurement and who uses it? – 4.How do we implement a performance measurement framework? – 5. Timeframe for the framework implementation – 6. How much will it cost to implement the framework? – 7. Communicating the importance of the framework – 8. Managing transition and change – 8.1. Impact on DLE agencies – 8.2. Potential training requirements – 8.3. Communication – 8.4. Evaluation – 8.5. Key challenges for national implementation.