Supporting Information on Lower-Level Programs

Sub-Program 1.1.1: National Security Leadership

Description:

This program develops and implements national security policy, legislation and programs that contribute to the Government’s ability to counter current and emerging threats. It is also responsible for assisting the Minister in fulfilling key statutory obligations. The program demonstrates interdepartmental leadership and Portfolio coordination through the implementation of Canada’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy, the listing of terrorist entities, and the review of foreign investments that raise national security concerns, as well as policy development and involvement in setting national security priorities. The program also exercises important leadership functions by collaborating domestically, internationally, across sectors and with communities to enhance understanding of national security challenges and to actively respond to national security threats. This program also facilitates the engagement of Canadians in a long-term dialogue on national security issues through the Cross Cultural Roundtable on Security, which solicits member views on policies and programs as well as their potential impact on Canadians.

Results Achieved
Expected results

Performance indicators

Target

Date to achieve target

2017–18 Actual results

2016–17 Actual results

2015–16 Actual results

Individuals and entities who pose national security threats are prevented from operating in Canada

Percentage of statutory obligations, including requests from PS Portfolio agencies, which are completed within given timelines

100%

March 31, 2018

100%

100%

100%

National security policies and programs are informed by input from Canadians

Percentage of presenters that take into consideration advice and perspectives from engagement sessions with community representatives and other stakeholders in the development of their programs and policies

≥ 60% of presenters reporting that they have taken into consideration advice and perspective from engagement sessions

March 31, 2019

100%

100%

N/AFootnote1

Policymakers, decision-makers and practitioners, as well as the general public have access to relevant research on terrorism and counter-terrorism

Percentage of selected users who provide a positive “Fit for use” rating for research projects in which key Public Safety has a role, e.g. through the Kanishka Project

≥ 60%

March 31, 2018

N/AFootnote2

80%

N/AFootnote3

 

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2017-18
Planned Spending

2017–18
Actual spending
(authorities used)

2017–18
Difference
(Actual spending minus Planned spending)

10,979,040

9,304,977

(1,674,063)

 

Human Resources (FTEs)
2017–18 Planned full-time equivalents

2017–18 Actual full-time equivalents

2017–18 Difference
(Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)

96

81

(15)

Sub-Program 1.1.2: Critical Infrastructure

Description:

Responsibility for critical infrastructure in Canada is shared by federal and provincial/territorial governments, local authorities and critical infrastructure owners and operators. This program exercises national leadership by coordinating with these partners to manage broad-scale protection efforts such as risk analysis, site assessments, plans and exercises. The intent of this program is to develop and implement policies to strengthen the resilience of critical infrastructure in Canada, including the National Strategy and Action Plan for Critical Infrastructure which sets out a comprehensive approach to risk-management and information sharing. Recognizing that the impacts of critical infrastructure disruptions can extend beyond national borders, the program is also leading an international approach to protecting our vital assets and systems.

Results Achieved
Expected results

Performance indicators

Target

Date to achieve target

2017–18 Actual results

2016–17 Actual results

2015–16 Actual results

Owners/
operators of critical infrastructure and the Government of Canada take risk management action

Percentage of stakeholders that have taken risk management action following site assessment

70%

March 31, 2018

100%

100%

N/AFootnote4

Partnerships are established with and among critical infrastructure sectors

Percentage of the ten (10) sectors represented at the National Cross Sector Forum

100%

March 31, 2018

100%

100%

100%

CI information is trusted and protected

Number of inappropriate disclosures

0

March 31, 2018

0

0

0

 

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2017-18
Planned Spending

2017–18
Actual spending
(authorities used)

2017–18
Difference
(Actual spending minus Planned spending)

4,870,615

4,377,767

(492,848)

 

Human Resources (FTEs)
2017–18 Planned full-time equivalents

2017–18 Actual full-time equivalents

2017–18 Difference
(Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)

42

36

(6)

 

Sub-Program 1.1.3: Cyber Security

Description:

The Cyber Security Program aims to ensure that Canada is prepared for and can respond to cyber security threats. It provides whole-of-government leadership and coordination of the development and delivery of policies and programs, and legislative and regulatory frameworks that increase the resiliency and security of Canada’s vital information and systems. The program contributes to Canada’s ability to address current and emerging cyber issues and helps to ensure that Canada is recognized as a global leader in cyber security. Recognizing that cyber security is a shared responsibility and that everyone has a role to play, the program facilitates the establishment and upholding of partnerships with provincial and territorial governments, private sector organizations, international counterparts, and academia. The program also enables the coordination of the federal response to cyber events and allows for the dissemination and exchange of cyber security-related information products with domestic and international stakeholders. Public awareness efforts are coordinated with partners, stakeholders and other levels of government.

 

Results Achieved
Expected results

Performance indicators

Target

Date to achieve

2017-18 Actual results (As of March 31, 2018)

2016–17 Actual results

2015–16 Actual results

 

Canada is prepared for and can respond to cyber security threats

Percentage of partner organizations reporting at least one cyber security incident per year to the Canadian Cyber Incident Response Centre (CCIRC)

20%

Ongoing

12.6%

11.2%

22.7

 

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2017-18
Planned Spending

2017–18
Actual spending
(authorities used)

2017–18
Difference
(Actual spending minus Planned spending)

13,795,768

12,901,540

(894,228)

 

Human Resources (FTEs)
2017–18 Planned full-time equivalents

2017–18 Actual full-time equivalents

2017–18 Difference
(Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)

91

89

(2)

Sub-Program 1.3.1: Crime Prevention

Description:

The National Crime Prevention Strategy (NCPS) is a key component of the federal government’s approach to reducing crime. The Strategy’s goal is to reduce offending among those most at risk, such as children, youth and Aboriginal Canadians who demonstrate various risk factors, and to prevent crimes such as drug-related offences, and serious and violent offences from being committed. The Strategy provides national leadership in the development and dissemination of evidence-based crime prevention programs and policies, and supports projects that are responsive and appropriate to community and regional needs. The NCPS provides funding through time-limited grants and contributions to community-based organizations, other levels of government and academia to support the implementation and evaluation of targeted interventions and other measures, as well as the development and dissemination of knowledge and practical tools. The program aims to increase coordination and integration of effective crime prevention policy and programs federally and with the provinces and territories, as well as increase the identification of, and response to, emerging priority issues and orientation of funding programs.

 

Results achieved
Expected results

Performance indicators

Target

Date to achieve target

2017–18 Actual results

2016–17 Actual results

2015–16 Actual results

Offending is reduced among at-risk populations (youth-at-risk, Aboriginal communities, and high risk repeat
offenders)

Percentage of Performance Monitoring and Assessment Reports (PMARs) received that indicate that projects are meeting their established targets

75%

March 31, 2018

65%Footnote5

50%

N/AFootnote6

Percentage of direct intervention projects with impact evaluations that report positive changes in participants’ risk factors related to offending

≥ 75%

March 31, 2018

72%

N/AFootnote7

N/AFootnote8

The body of knowledge related to crime prevention is increased

Number of crime prevention knowledge-oriented resources (research reports, practice-oriented tools, communities of practice and learning events, presentations, etc.) that are produced and disseminated

10-20
per year

March 31, 2018

20

23

21

Percentage of impact evaluations with clear, demonstrable results

100%

March 31, 2018

92%

N/AFootnote9

N/AFootnote10

 

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2017-18
Planned Spending

2017–18
Actual spending
(authorities used)

2017–18
Difference
(Actual spending minus Planned spending)

49,307,966

55,379,182

6,071,216

 

Human Resources (FTEs)
2017–18 Planned full-time equivalents

2017–18 Actual full-time equivalents

2017–18 Difference
(Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)

52

63

11

Sub-Program 1.3.2: Law Enforcement Leadership

Description:

This program provides leadership to the Canadian law enforcement community on strategic national and international responses to crime by contributing to the development of appropriate law enforcement policies and programs. Due to the sophistication and changing nature of crime, responses must be multifaceted. This program provides the horizontal coordination and leadership necessary for collaboration amongst all federal, provincial, territorial and international partners, and the law enforcement community, in order to ensure that activities are successful and aligned with the Minister’s and Government’s agenda. It focuses on areas such as serious and organized crime; the prevention of child sexual exploitation; human trafficking; economic and financial crime; First Nations policing agreements; firearms policy; strategic and operational policing policy; support for the operation and accountability of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police; and the Economics of Policing and Community Safety.

 

Results Achieved
Expected results

Performance indicators

Target

Date to achieve target

2017–18 Actual results

2016–17 Actual results

2015–16 Actual results

Crime in Canada is attenuated

Police-reported Crime Rate Footnote11

≤ previous year

March 31, 2018

5,334 incidents per 100,000 population

5,224 incidents per 100,000 population

5,198 incidents per 100,000

Police-reported Crime Severity Index Footnote12

≤ previous year

March 31, 2018

72.9

71.7Footnote13

70.1Footnote14

 

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2017-18
Planned Spending

2017–18
Actual spending
(authorities used)

2017–18
Difference
(Actual spending minus Planned spending)

156,656,254

117,874,306

(38,781,948)

 

Human Resources (FTEs)
2017–18 Planned full-time equivalents

2017–18 Actual full-time equivalents

2017–18 Difference
(Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)

126

122

(4)

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.2.1: Serious and Organized Crime

Description:

Organized crime groups are sophisticated, adaptable, complex and transnational in nature. Responses must therefore be equally multifaceted. This program plays a national leadership role to coordinate portfolio activities, and brings cohesion to agencies and departments to better ensure they are working together effectively to support the Minister and the Government’s agenda. This program involves providing evidence-based research and policy advice, leadership and horizontal coordination for the development of federal, national and international strategies to combat serious and organized crime. It works in collaboration with other federal departments and agencies, provinces and territories, NGOs and international partners, focusing on areas such as human trafficking; child sexual exploitation; illicit drugs; economic and financial crime; organized crime that targets vulnerable communities such as some indigenous communities; witness protection; the DNA regime; contraband tobacco; and developing legislative proposals.

 

Results Achieved
Expected results

Performance indicators

Target

Date to achieve target

2017–18 Actual results

2016–17 Actual results

2015–16 Actual results

Law Enforcement is able to combat serious and organized crime

Percentage of policies, strategies, and initiatives that were updated, revised or developed to address emerging issues in serious and organized crime

≥ 80%

March 31, 2018

100%

100%

100%

Capital market fraud is detected and investigated

Percentage of referrals by Integrated Market Enforcement Teams which were analyzed and actioned for investigation, or referred to other law enforcement or securities’ authorities

100%

March 31, 2018

N/AFootnote15

100%

100%

 

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2017-18
Planned Spending

2017–18
Actual spending
(authorities used)

2017–18
Difference
(Actual spending minus Planned spending)

20,302,305

19,959,083

(343,222)

 

Human Resources (FTEs)
2017–18 Planned full-time equivalents

2017–18 Actual full-time equivalents

2017–18 Difference
(Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)

50

51

1

 

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.2.2: Royal Canadian Mounted Police and Policing

Description:

Crime and policing issues are ongoing challenges for all societies, including Canada’s. Public safety is a core responsibility of government and within this, policing and policing policy is continuously evolving and always a priority. This program’s mandate is derived from the Minister’s legislative responsibilities in initiating, recommending, coordinating, implementing and promoting policing policies, programs or projects, and specific accountabilities associated with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, including the establishment of strategic priorities. This program provides strategic policy advice to support the Minister in carrying out these responsibilities. In providing this advice, this program leads collaborative efforts and consultations with key partners, such as provinces, territories and stakeholder associations, to promote information sharing, cohesion and cooperation on cross-cutting issues such as the Economics of Policing and Community Safety Initiatives, firearms policy, security for major events, and RCMP police services agreements.

 

Results Achieved
Expected results

Performance indicators

Target

Date to achieve target

2017–18 Actual results

2016–17 Actual results

2015–16 Actual results

Canadians have confidence in the national police service

Percentage of Canadians who have trust and confidence in the RCMP

≥ previous year (78%; 2016)Footnote16

March 31, 2018

N/AFootnote17

78%Footnote18

N/AFootnote19

Efficient and effective policing and community safety practices are identified and promoted

Increased number of individual visits to the Index of Policing Initiatives year over year

Base:
>  22,000 individual visits to the Index

March 31, 2018

24,265

21,568

N/AFootnote20

Increased compliance with the firearms control framework

Rate of firearms license renewals (rate of licensees deemed to be in possession of restricted and/or prohibited firearms, who renewed their license)

≥ previous period
(91.3%; 2013)

The data source for this performance measure (RCMP Commissioner Firearms Report) may not be available for the 2017-18 reporting year.

N/AFootnote21

88.2%

87.7%

 

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2017-18
Planned Spending

2017–18
Actual spending
(authorities used)

2017–18
Difference
(Actual spending minus Planned spending)

5,871,462

8,226,542

2,355,080

 

Human Resources (FTEs)
2017–18 Planned full-time equivalents

2017–18 Actual full-time equivalents

2017–18 Difference
(Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)

32

28

(4)

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.2.3: Aboriginal Policing

Description:

The Department advances this key activity through the administration of the First Nations Policing Program (FNPP). The program provides funding to support policing services that are professional, dedicated and responsive to the First Nation and Inuit communities they serve. The program is delivered through contribution agreements among the federal government, provincial or territorial governments, and First Nations and Inuit communities. The Department conducts performance measurement activities to ensure that credible performance data is being collected to support effective program monitoring and evaluation activities. In addition, the Department provides broad policy advice and conducts relevant research on Aboriginal policing and justice issues, and Aboriginal self-government; and engages stakeholders in developing policy options for improving public safety in First Nation and Inuit communities and for the renewal of the Program. Lastly, the FNPP works collaboratively with other federal, provincial and territorial partners in addressing diverse challenges in First Nation and Inuit communities.

 

Results Achieved
Expected results

Performance indicators

Target

Date to achieve target

2017–18 Actual results

2016–17 Actual          results

2015–16 Actual results

First Nations and Inuit communities have access to dedicated and responsive police services

Percentage of First Nation and Inuit population covered by police agreements

≥ 63%

March 31, 2018

79%

79%

N/A Footnote22

Crime is attenuated in First Nations and Inuit communities

A sustained reduction in police reported crime over time

≤ 22,100 incidents of crime per 100,000 population in FNPP
covered communities

March 31, 2018

16,944

17,202

N/A Footnote23

 

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2017-18
Planned Spending

2017–18
Actual spending
(authorities used)

2017–18
Difference
(Actual spending minus Planned spending)

130,482,487

89,688,681

(40,793,806)

 

Human Resources (FTEs)
2017–18 Planned full-time equivalents

2017–18 Actual full-time equivalents

2017–18 Difference
(Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)

44

43

(1)

Sub-Program 1.3.3: Corrections

Description:

The program supports the Minister’s public policy leadership role in corrections and criminal justice, specifically with respect to the Minister’s legislative responsibility to initiate, recommend, coordinate, implement and promote policies, programs or projects relating to Correctional Services Canada and the Parole Board of Canada. The program is responsible for providing advice on the strategic priorities of these agencies and on a broad range of national correctional and criminal justice program, policy and legislative issues and activities; leading legislative reforms; and the management of some litigation. In fulfilling its mandate, the program leads collaborative efforts with other portfolio agencies and actively works with and supports provincial and territorial partners as well as consulting with other stakeholders such as non-governmental organizations. The program also develops and implements innovative approaches to community justice in Aboriginal communities through contribution funding, as well as facilitating the sharing of information to promote public safety objectives concerning the correctional system generally and in particular with respect to victims through the National Office for Victims at Public Safety Canada.

 

Results Achieved
Expected results

Performance indicators

Target

Date to achieve target

2017–18 Actual results

2016–17 Actual results

2015–16 Actual results

Victims of crime are aware of the services available to them and are making use of those services, as needed

Number of victims who register for information sharing with CSC and PBC

≥ total registrants from previous year

March 31, 2018Footnote24

8,053

7,806Footnote25

7,929

 

Safe and effective reintegration of eligible offenders into Canadian communities

Percentage of successfully completed day and full paroles

Day: 80%;
Full: 70%

March 31, 2018

Day: 92%
Full: 90%

Day: 93%
Full: 90%

Day: 90.9%;
Full: 87.2%

First Nations, Métis, Inuit or urban Aboriginal communities have the knowledge and ability to improve community safety and to assume responsibility for issues adversely affecting safety in communities

Number of First Nations, Métis, Inuit or urban Aboriginal communities that have received training and gained capacity to develop community safety plans and develop innovative approaches to enhance community safety

> 6-8 Community Safety Plans;
> 10-15 communities engaged;

> 3 Innovative Projects
commencedFootnote26

March 31, 2018

3 completed Community Safety Plans;

44 communities engaged in process;

1 Innovative Project commenced.

7 completed Community Safety Plans;

24 additional communities received training and gained capacity;

4 Innovative Projects commenced

15

 

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2017-18
Planned Spending

2017–18
Actual spending
(authorities used)

2017–18
Difference
(Actual spending minus Planned spending)

7,747,339

9,697,718

1,950,379

 

Human Resources (FTEs)
2017–18 Planned full-time equivalents

2017–18 Actual full-time equivalents

2017–18 Difference
(Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)

46

48

2

Sub-Program 1.4.1: Emergency Prevention/Mitigation

Description:

This sub-program provides federal and national leadership concerning prevention/mitigation, which aims to proactively protect lives, property, the environment, communities and the economy from disasters/emergencies, and to avoid or reduce losses and damages when they do occur. It supports efforts at the federal, provincial, territorial and municipal levels that reinforce the capacity of Canada and its institutions to prevent and mitigate all hazards to the safety and security of Canadians, by leveraging new and existing government programming. This sub-program supports cost-shared financial investments with provinces and territories with the aim of preventing or mitigating the risk of hazards and the impacts of future disasters. The sub-program facilitates risk identification, assessments and risk prioritization within the federal community and within federal, provincial and territorial fora for the purposes of informing responsible risk management and the efficient use of program resources. In addition, the sub-program engages other stakeholders to assist in the identification and prevention/mitigation of disaster risks, and develops strategies and programs geared towards enhancing the knowledge, awareness and capacity for coherent action at all levels. This sub-program also includes the National Search and Rescue Secretariat (NSS) which is responsible for the management and coordination of the National Search and Rescue Program (NSP) and ensures best use is made of search and rescue partners’ diverse resources and capabilities, particularly in the area of prevention programming.

 

Results Achieved

Expected results

Performance indicators

Target

Date to achieve target

2017–18 Actual results

2016–17 Actual results

2015–16 Actual results

Provincial and territorial governments have the capacity to mitigate impacts of future disasters

Percentage of mitigation contribution funding that was committed during the fiscal year:

    • National Disaster Mitigation Program (NDMP) contribution funding
    • Disaster Financial Assistance Agreements (DFAA) 15% mitigation provision funding

NDMP: 100% of yearly allocation
DFAA: Baseline to be established based on 2016-17 results

March 31, 2018

NDMP:
47%Footnote27
DFAA:
55.4%

100%

N/AFootnote28

Number of mitigation projects approved in current fiscal year

100

March 31, 2018

87

55

N/AFootnote29

Federal institutions have taken mitigative and preventative actions to address risks to Canadians

Percentage of federal institutions that have addressed prevention/mitigation in their emergency management plans

≥ 80%

March 31, 2018

N/AFootnote30

100%

84%

 

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2017-18
Planned Spending

2017–18
Actual spending
(authorities used)

2017–18
Difference
(Actual spending minus Planned spending)

56,703,680

34,107,492

(22,596,188)

 

Human Resources (FTEs)
2017–18 Planned full-time equivalents

2017–18 Actual full-time equivalents

2017–18 Difference
(Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)

47

57

10

Sub-Program 1.4.2: Emergency Preparedness

Description:

This sub-program promotes preparedness for emergencies in Canada by supporting the ability of federal institutions and other stakeholders to plan for incidents on an all-hazards basis. It also provides guidance and strategic direction for exercises and training, encourages public awareness, and facilitates interoperability to enhance the manner in which information is shared. This sub-program features the development of all-hazards plans that engage the whole community in managing the life cycle of a potential emergency. This includes maintaining 24/7 situational awareness and early warning; identifying and evaluating risk; developing contingency plans for major events and all-hazard event management; and providing decision-makers with required information in order to better plan and prepare to reduce the vulnerability of people, property, the environment and the economy. The sub-program also leads the management of the Continuity of Constitutional Government program, supporting the three branches of the Constitutional Government of Canada to develop and implement procedures allowing essential functions of government to continue in the event of a large-scale emergency affecting the National Capital Region. As a complement, the sub-program provides guidance to federal institutions in the development of business continuity plans to ensure the sustainability of essential federal services in the event of disruptions to federal entities’ infrastructure and other critical resources. It also assesses and ensures conformity of these plans with standards set out in various legislative and policy instruments.

The National Exercise program, which is also included as part of this sub-program, enhances the all-hazards capability to manage emergencies across the country by providing training and learning opportunities for government and members of the emergency management community, as well as opportunities to examine the collective response to emergencies through multi-jurisdictional exercises. Moreover, the Continuous Improvement of Federal Event Response (CIFER) enhances preparedness through improved sharing, tracking, implementing, and reporting on lessons learned and best practices within the federal community.

 

Results Achieved
Expected results

Performance indicators

Target

Date to achieve target

2017–18       Actual results

2016–17 Actual results

2015–16 Actual results

Exercises contribute to the evaluation, validation and/or improvement of the Government of Canada’s all hazards emergency management plans, procedures and protocols

Percentage of whole-of-government exercise priorities that are addressed by national exercises over a 2-year period as per the Federal Exercise Priority Setting and Planning Cycle

80%

March 31, 2018

100%

82%

N/AFootnote31

Canada is prepared to respond to events affecting the national interest

Percentage of federal institutions assessed that have achieved an acceptable assessment/ evaluation rating or higher on their emergency management plans

80%

March 31, 2018

N/AFootnote32

100%

81%

 

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2017–18
Planned spending

2017–18
Actual spending
(authorities used

2017–18
Difference
(Actual spending minus Planned spending)

8,070,141

12,218,387

4,148,246

 

Human Resources (FTEs)
2017–18 Planned full-time equivalents

2017–18 Actual full-time equivalents

2017–18 Difference
(Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)

84

78

(6)

Sub-Program 1.4.3: Emergency Response

Description:

This sub-program leads and coordinates the support to partners across all regions and the delivery of an all-hazard integrated federal response for events that threaten the safety and security of Canadians or the integrity of Canada's critical infrastructure. It provides 24/7 watch and early warning, as well as strategic-level response coordination on behalf of the Government of Canada in support of partner mandates. The program provides definitive national-level situational awareness (e.g. Notifications, Situation Reports, intelligence products, briefings) to partners and senior decision makers, and to senior officials, provincial governments and/or the private sector. It monitors whole-of-government response capability; plans for and coordinates the federal response to events affecting the national interest; develops recommendations for the deployment and utilization of federal resources; and actions requests for response assistance from federal or provincial/territorial authorities.

Working with the provinces, territories and international partners, the program supports the Deputy Minister and Assistant Deputy Minister communities when responding to events by providing them with information on evolving events, a mechanism for the implementation of their direction, and identifying issues that need their engagement for resolution. The program contributes to the efficient use of Government of Canada strategic assets and, when offered, the resources of provincial and territorial governments. This program also coordinates regional offices to support provincial and territorial partners in addressing emergencies.

 

Results Achieved

Expected results

Performance indicators

Target

Date to achieve target

2017–18 Actual results

2016–17 Actual results

2015–16 Actual results

Canada has a comprehensive approach to risk assessment and planning that supports a coordinated response to events affecting the national interest

Percentage of stakeholders indicating that the GOC provided effective leadership and coordination for events affecting the national interest

80%

March 31, 2018

N/AFootnote33

86%Footnote34

 

N/AFootnote35

 

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2017–18
Planned spending

2017–18
Actual spending
(authorities used

2017–18
Difference
(Actual spending minus Planned spending)

11,498,210

50,957,502

39,459,292

 

Human Resources (FTEs)
2017–18 Planned full-time equivalents

2017–18 Actual full-time equivalents

2017–18 Difference
(Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)

107

95

(12)

Sub-Program 1.4.4: Emergency Recovery

Description:

This sub-program serves to support the rapid and effective recovery of Canadians and communities from disasters. It includes the provision of financial assistance to Provinces and Territories, upon request, through programs, such as the Disaster Financial Assistance Arrangements, for recovery from large scale disasters. In recognition of the inter-connectedness between the functions of emergency management, the initial phases of post-event recovery are integrated into event management planning to foster smoother transition from response to recovery, and the inclusion of disaster mitigation is encouraged during recovery in order to reduce the occurrence and impact of future risk and disasters.

The goal of this sub-program is to provide leadership and direction at all levels, so that those individuals, businesses and communities impacted by disaster have the resources and support needed to fully recover. Efforts focus on not only rebuilding communities that are safer and more resilient, but also on pre-disaster recovery planning which is intended to better enable those individuals and communities to more rapidly access the necessary resources needed to begin rebuilding lives and communities. At the federal level, the sub-program works with other government departments to foster consistency, coherence and alignment between federal disaster support and assistance to provinces, territories and other stakeholders.

 

Results Achieved

Expected results

Performance indicators

Target

Date to achieve target

2017–18 Actual results

2016–17 Actual results

2015–16 Actual results

Provinces and territories receive  support to assist with response and recovery from major disasters

Percentage of DFAA requests for assistance which are approved

100% of requests approved

 

March 31, 2018

100%

100%

N/AFootnote36

Canada can effectively provide initial recovery operations following an event affecting the national interest

Percentage of stakeholders who found that the information, guidance, and decision support provided by the GOC increased the effectiveness of their response and recovery efforts

100%

March 31, 2018

N/AFootnote37

87%Footnote38

 

N/AFootnote39

 

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2017–18
Planned spending

2017–18
Actual spending
(authorities used

2017–18
Difference
(Actual spending minus Planned spending)

681,245,838

583,560,093

(97,685,745)

 

Human Resources (FTEs)
2017–18 Planned full-time equivalents

2017–18 Actual full-time equivalents

2017–18 Difference
(Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)

15

15

0

Notes

  1. 1

    Public Safety Canada launched national security consultations in September 2016.

  2. 2

    The Canada Centre will launch data gathering and analysis on research-related functions in the 2018-19 cycle. With the official launch of the Canada Centre in June of 2017, ongoing work to develop a national countering radicalization to violence strategy, and most projects funded by the Community Resilience Fund being in early stages, it was premature to carry out “Fit for use” surveys or similar methods in 2017-18.

  3. 3

    This was a new indicator as of 2016-17, so there is no previous data available to report.

  4. 4

    This indicator was only measured as of 2016-17 when the stakeholder survey was launched.

  5. 5

    Public Safety has received a low number of PMARs due to technical issues with the automated functionality of Public Safety Canada’s Information Management System (PSIMS) that has affected the Department’s ability to achieve the target.  Public Safety Canada has acknowledged this concern and is currently piloting new methods to collect this information to increase the reliability and validity of the reporting.

  6. 6

    This is a new indicator as of 2016-17, so there is no previous data available to report.

  7. 7

    As Public Safety Canada stated in the 2016-17 Departmental Results Report, results for this indicator were only available for the 2017-18 reporting period.

  8. 8

    As Public Safety Canada stated in the 2016-17 Departmental Results Report, results for this indicator were only available for the 2017-18 reporting period.

  9. 9

    As Public Safety Canada stated in the 2016-17 Departmental Results Report, results for this indicator were only available for the 2017-18 reporting period.

  10. 10

    This is a new indicator as of 2016-17, so there is no previous data available to report.

  11. 11

    The police-reported crime rates are based on the Juristats published by Statistics Canada each calendar year using data collected from the Uniform Crime Reporting Survey which can be found here: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2018001/article/54974-eng.htm

  12. 12

    The police-reported Crime Severity Index statistics reported in this table are based on the Juristats published by Statistics Canada each year using data collected from the Uniform Crime Reporting Survey which can be found here: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/legal51a-eng.htm

  13. 13

    Although the previous result for 2016-17 was 71, in its 2017 publication, the Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics re-evaluated   the 2016 figure, based on police services’ updates.

  14. 14

    Although the previous result for 2015-16 was 69.7, in its 2016 publication, the Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics re-evaluated the 2015 figure, based on police services’ updates.

  15. 15

    The RCMP continues to detect and investigate capital market fraud. However, data for 2017-18 was not available at the time this report was produced.

  16. 16

    At the time the 2017-18 Departmental Plan was produced, the most recent results from this survey dated from 2012. With the 2016 survey results now publicly available, Public Safety Canada will use 78% as its baseline, instead of the 2012 baseline of 82%.

  17. 17

    At the time this report was produced, the results of the 2017 survey had not been published by the RCMP.

  18. 18

    Source: RCMP. Canadians’ Views of RCMP Policing Services 2016. (http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/en/canadians-views-rcmp-policing-services-2016)

  19. 19

    No data was available at the time as the last survey had been administered in 2012.

  20. 20

    This is a new indicator as of 2016-17, so there is no previous data available to report.

  21. 21

    The data is published by the RCMP by calendar year, and at the time this report was produced, the data had not yet been made available for 2017.

  22. 22

    Unit measure and scope of indicator changed in 2016-17, so there is no previous data available to report.

  23. 23

    This actual result was erroneously published as being N/A in Public Safety Canada’s 2017-18 Departmental Plan. The actual result should have read 17,328 as it was reported in Public Safety Canada’s 2016-17 Departmental Results Report.

  24. 24

    Data was not available for 2017-18 as reported in the Departmental Plan, however, there was a change in the system tracking the number of victims who register for information sharing with CSC and PBC. The data is now available to Public Safety Canada and is being collected using the Victims Portal.

  25. 25

    As a result of the creation of the Correctional Service Canada (CSC)/Parole Board of Canada (PBC) Victims Portal, CSC and PBC have changed data platforms to the new victim module of the Criminal Records Management (CRM) system. Unlike in past years, each victim has only one contract record in CRM that is linked to one or more offender records; thus each victim is only counted once. Previously, a victim record was created for each offender for which a victim was registered; thus a small number of victims were counted twice. Additionally, CSC and PBC register victims independently in CRM. It should be noted that the number of registered victims reported in the table above represents victims registered by CSC only.

  26. 26

    The target for this indicator was updated in 2016-17 as a result of the strategic reframing that the Aboriginal Community Safety Development Program underwent in response to the program’s MRAP. Consequently, the actuals for 2016-17 are now broken down into three categories to better reflect the realities of the program’s funding structure and report on the actual results of the program.

  27. 27

    The actual for this reporting period is below the target as there were a high number of amendment requests from National Disaster Mitigation Program recipients asking to move activities and costs to 2018-19 due to project delays.

  28. 28

    This is a new indicator as of 2016-17, so there is no previous data available to report.

  29. 29

    This is a new indicator as of 2016-17, so there is no previous data available to report.

  30. 30

    Public Safety did not complete any evaluations based on the evaluation methodology framework. The framework is currently being updated to take into consideration legislative and policy requirements; information sharing and learning; and, provide for more accurate reporting and evaluation of federal institutions.

  31. 31

    This is a new indicator as of 2016-17, so there is no previous data available to report.

  32. 32

    Public Safety did not complete any evaluations based on the evaluation methodology framework. The framework is currently being updated to take into consideration legislative and policy requirements; information sharing and learning; and, provide for more accurate reporting and evaluation of federal institutions.

  33. 33

    Public Safety Canada was unable to send questionnaires in time for this report. The actual for 2017-18 will be available in the next reporting period.

  34. 34

    The result is based on qualitative responses received from stakeholders through the annual questionnaire. The GOC is working  
    to establish a target baseline to be used in future reports.

  35. 35

    This is a new indicator as of 2016-17, so there is no previous data available to report.

  36. 36

    This is a new indicator as of 2016-17, so there is no previous data available to report.

  37. 37

    Public Safety Canada was unable to send questionnaires in time for this report. The actual for 2017-18 will be available in the next reporting period.

  38. 38

    The result is based on qualitative responses received from stakeholders through the annual questionnaire. The GOC is working to establish a target baseline to be used in future reports.

  39. 39

    This is a new indicator as of 2016-17, so there is no previous data available to report.

Date modified: