Annual Report to Parliament on the Administration of the Privacy Act 2011-2012
Table of contents
- Chapter 1 – Report on the Privacy Act
- Chapter II – Privacy Act Statistical Report
- Overall Workload Trends
- Requests Received under the Privacy Act
- Extensions
- Performance in Meeting Statutory Response Deadlines
- Disposition of Requests for 2011-2012
- Consultations from Other Institutions
- Investigations
- Privacy Impact Assessments Completed During the Year
- Disclosures Pursuant to Paragraph 8(2)(m) of the Privacy Act
- Appendix A –Delegation of Authority for the Privacy Act
- Appendix B –Statistical Report for 2011-2012 on the Privacy Act
- Additional Reporting Requirements
Chapter 1– Report on the Privacy Act
About Public Safety Canada
Public Safety Canada exercises a broad leadership role that brings coherence to the activities of the departments and agencies responsible for public safety and security. The Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Act, 2005, and the Emergency Management Act, 2007, set out two fundamental roles for the Department: supporting the Minister's responsibility for all matters except those assigned to another federal minister related to public safety and emergency management, including national leadership; and coordinating the efforts of Portfolio agencies, as well as provide guidance on their strategic priorities. The Department's leadership role is reflected in its strategic outcome, a safe and resilient Canada, and through the pursuit of the following program activities: National Security, Border Strategies, Countering Crime, Emergency Management and Internal Services. The Department, in its portfolio coordination role, brings strategic focus to the overall safety and security agenda. In fulfilling its mandate, the Department works in consultation with other organizations and partners – federal departments and agencies, provinces and territories, non-government organizations, the private sector, foreign states, academia and communities.
About the Public Safety Portfolio
The Public Safety Portfolio encompasses nine organizations for which the Minister of Public Safety is responsible. In addition to Public Safety Canada, the Portfolio includes the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC), the Parole Board of Canada (PBC),and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). It also includes three arm's-length review bodies: the RCMP External Review Committee, the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP, and the Office of the Correctional Investigator. Each organization in the portfolio administers its own access to information and privacy programs, under authorities delegated to them by the Minister.
About the Privacy Act
The Privacy Act protects the privacy of all Canadian citizens and permanent residents of Canada regarding personal information held by a government institution against unauthorized use and disclosure. The Privacy Act also gives Canadians, including those in Canada who are not permanent residents or citizens, the right to access personal information held by the government.
Section 72 of the Privacy Act requires that the head of every government institution submit an annual report to Parliament on the administration of the Act during the financial year. This report describes how Public Safety Canada administered the Privacy Act throughout fiscal year 2010-2011.
The Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Unit
The Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Unit is part of Public Safety Canada's Executive Services Division within the Department's Strategic Policy Branch. It consists of one Manager, two senior advisors, four analysts, one junior analyst and one administrative officer. The ATIP Manager served as the Department's ATIP Coordinator throughout the reporting year.
The ATIP Unit is responsible for the coordination and implementation of policies, guidelines and procedures to ensure departmental compliance with the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act. The Unit is responsible for responding to requests made under the Acts, as well as providing the following services to the Department:
- processing consultations received from other institutions;
- providing advice and guidance to employees and senior officials on ATIP related matters;
- producing the Annual Reports to Parliament;
- delivering ATIP awareness sessions to departmental employees;
- coordinating regular updates to Info Source manuals;
- reviewing departmental documents, such as audits and evaluations, prior to proactively disclosing these on the departmental website;
- developing departmental procedures for processing ATIP requests;
- maintaining the Department's ATIP reading room; and
- participating in forums for the ATIP community, such as the Treasury Board Secretariat's ATIP Community meetings and working groups.
Delegation of Authority
The Minister signed a new Delegation Order for the Privacy Act on March 8, 2012. Both the current and previous delegation instruments are reproduced at Annex A.
The responsibilities associated with the administration of the Privacy Act such as notifying applicants of extensions and transferring requests to other institutions, are delegated to employees of the ATIP Unit through a delegation instrument signed by the Minister of Public Safety.
Previously, the approval of all exemptions was delegated to the Department's Deputy Minister, Associate Deputy Minister, five Assistant Deputy Ministers (ADMs), one Associate ADM, the Director General of Communications, and the Chief Audit Executive.
The current delegation order provides the authority for the application of all exemptions to the Deputy Minister, the Associate Deputy Minister, the ATIP Manager and the Senior Assistant Deputy Minister of National Security. The other Branch Heads no longer have the authority to apply exemptions under the Privacy Act, but maintain delegation for the protection of personal information used in the administration of their programs as required by section 10 of the Act.
Highlights and Accomplishments for 2011-2012
Public Safety Canada has continued to improve the way in which the Department responds to Privacy Act requests, by focusing on improving timeliness, efficiency and accuracy. Some of the highlights are as follows:
- The ATIP Unit ensured that the Department's information holdings were updated and included in the last Info Source update. In addition, one new institution-specific Personal Information Bank was created and registered with Treasury Board Secretariat.
- The ATIP Unit assisted in the completion of one Privacy Impact Assessment this year, and is committed to continuing to assist program officials with other ongoing Privacy Impact Assessments.
New/Revised Policies/Guidelines or Procedures
Privacy Breach Guidelines
The ATIP Unit created, with the assistance of a number of other government departments, Privacy Breach Guidelines in order to provide Public Safety Canada employees with the information and resources required to respond to potential privacy breaches. The guidelines were approved by the Deputy Minister and are available to all departmental employees on the departmental Intranet site.
Change of Delegation
Given the change of the delegation instrument, new procedures were implemented for the application of exemptions and the selection of the appropriate delegated authority.
Training
The ATIP Unit developed training materials to help departmental employees understand the Privacy Act and their role in protecting personal information. While no training sessions were offered in the reporting year, the training material normally used for the sessions were available to all employees on the Department's intranet site.
Challenges
Competing priorities
The ATIP Unit at Public Safety Canada has no resources dedicated to privacy policy or training, therefore these activities are often given secondary priority to the processing of requests for information under the Access to Information Act and Privacy Act.. Requests under the Privacy Act are given equal priority to those under the Access to Information Act, but the policies, advice and training provided to the department can only be provided where time permits.
Increasing volume and complexity
Public Safety Canada has seen a significant increase in the volume of requests (see Overall Workload Trends for details). The complexity of the requests received is also challenging. The Analysts in the ATIP Unit have significant experience both in the department and in ATIP which provides a great breadth of understanding of the subject matter; however, significant review must take place as much of the personal information requested is intertwined with other individuals' personal information.
Chapter II – Privacy Act Statistical Report
Overall Workload Trends
Annex B provides a summarized statistical report on Privacy Act requests processed by Public Safety Canada between April 1, 2011 and March 31, 2012. The following section provides an overview and interpretation of this information.
In comparison to the past five years, the overall workload for the ATIP Unit increased this year. The figures below include formal Access and Privacy requests, and consultations received from other institutions. They do not reflect requests processed informally or other services that the ATIP Unit provides to the Department.
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 | 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATI requests received by Public Safety Canada | 296 | 235 | 208 | 298 | 363 |
Privacy requests received by Public Safety Canada | 17 | 12 | 37 | 32 | 55 |
ATI consultations received from other institutions | 175 | 198 | 136 | 223 | 235 |
Privacy consultations received from other institutions | 7 | 10 | 18 | 9 | 21 |
Total workload | 495 | 455 | 399 | 562 | 674 |
Requests Received under the Privacy Act
The number of privacy requests, while increasing, remains small compared to the volume of access to information requests. Public Safety collects little information directly from Canadians and therefore received very few privacy requests. In comparison, portfolio agencies whose mandates are more operational in nature, such as the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and Correctional Service of Canada (CSC), received thousands of privacy requests annually.
Throughout the year, the Department received 55 new requests under the Privacy Act. Three were carried forward from the previous year, resulting in a total of 58 requests for the 2011-2012 fiscal year. Of these requests, 55 were completed during the reporting period. Three requests have been carried forward to the next reporting year.
Extensions
Section 15 of the Privacy Act allows institutions to extend the legal deadline for processing a request if a search for responsive records cannot be completed within 30 days of receipt of the request or if the institution must consult with other institutions. During the 2011-2012 fiscal year, the Department invoked 34 extensions of 30 days or less. Two extensions were invoked due to a high volume of records and interference with operations, and thirty-four extensions were required in order to undertake consultations with other federal institutions.
Performance in Meeting Statutory Response Deadlines
Of the 55 completed requests, 19 were completed within 30 days. 33 requests were completed between 31-60 days, two between 61 and 120 days, and one was completed in 121-180 days. Of the 55 requests completed, 52 met the statutory deadline.
Disposition of Requests for 2011-2012
Thirty-nine requests received under the Privacy Act were disclosed without exemptions applied. Seven were disclosed in part. Six requests had no responsive records, and three were abandoned.
Consultations from Other Institutions
The Department's role in coordinating with other federal institutions as well as those within the Public Safety portfolio has resulted in the Department having an interest in the records processed by other institutions.
The Department received a total of 21 consultations from other institutions processing requests under the Privacy Act in 2011-2012, which is an increase over the nine received last year.
Investigations
One complaint notification was received from the Privacy Commissioner this year, alleging that the Department denied the requester access to their personal information. This complaint was deemed to be not well-founded.
One of these complaint investigations was concluded this year, resulting in a finding of resolved. The investigation into the other complaint is ongoing.
One finding was received from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner on a complaint that was filed last fiscal year alleging that the Department denied the requester access to their personal information. This complaint was also deemed to be not well-founded.
Appeal to the Court
No appeals to the Federal Court or the Federal Court of Appeal were submitted for the reporting year.
Privacy ImpactAssessments Completed During the Year
Air IndiaEx-Gratia Payments
Air India Ex-Gratia Payments
The Department completed a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for the one time ex-gratia payment to the qualifying families of passengers and crew members of Air India Flight 182 in recognition of the suffering the families had to endure due to years of unanswered questions relating to the tragedy. This PIA was submitted to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner.
Disclosures Pursuant to Paragraph 8(2)(m) of the Privacy Act
Subsection 8(2)(m) of the Privacy Act provides the head of the institution with the authority to disclose personal information where the public interest in disclosure clearly outweighs any invasion of privacy that could result from the disclosure, or where the disclosure would clearly benefit the individual to whom the information relates.
During the reporting period, Public Safety Canada disclosed personal information pursuant to paragraph 8(2)(m) of the Privacy Act in two instances.
In the first, personal information was provided to the Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee of Ontario in order to assist them in obtaining authority to manage the financial affairs of an individual.
The Minister has determined that he will be releasing publicly all reconsideration decisions he makes under the International Transfer of Offenders Act, and released one this fiscal year pursuant to paragraph 8(2)(m)(i) of the Privacy Act.
In both cases, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner was advised before the information was disclosed.
Appendix A – Delegation of Authority for the Privacy Act
The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, pursuant to section 73 of the Access to Information Act*, hereby designates the persons holding the positions set out below, or the persons occupying on an acting basis those positions, to exercise the powers, duties and functions of the Minister as the head of the Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, under the provisions of the Act and related regulations set out in the schedule opposite each position. This designation replaces all previous delegation orders.
Section/ Article | Action | Deputy Minister & Associate Deputy Minister | Assistant Deputy Minister – National Security | Assistant Deputy Ministers, Chief Audit Executive, Director General Communications | ATIP Manager | Senior ATIP Advisors & ATIP Analysts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8(2)(j) | Disclosure for research purposes | ● | ● | |||
8(2)(m) | Disclosure inthe public interest or in the interest of the individual | ● | ||||
8(4) | Copies of requests under 8(2)(e) to be retained | ● | ● | |||
8(5) | Notice of disclosure under 8(2)(m) | ● | ● | |||
9(1) | Record of disclosures to be retained | ● | ● | |||
9(4) | Consistent uses | ● | ● | ● | ● | |
10 | Personal information to be included in personal information banks | ● | ● | ● | ● | |
14 | Notice when access requested | ● | ● | |||
15 | Extension of time limits | ● | ● | ● | ||
17(2)(b) | Language of access | ● | ● | |||
17(3)(b) | Access to personal information in alternative format | ● | ● | |||
18(2) | Exemption (exempt bank) – Disclosure may be refused | ● | ● | |||
19(1) | Exemption – Personal information obtained in confidence | ● | ● | ● | ||
19(2) | Exemption – Where authorized to disclose | ● | ● | ● | ||
20 | Exemption – Federal-provincial affairs | ● | ● | ● | ||
21 | Exemption – International affairs and defence | ● | ● | ● | ||
22 | Exemption – Law enforcement and investigations | ● | ● | ● | ||
22.3 | Exemption– Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act | ● | ● | ● | ||
23 | Exemption– Security clearances | ● | ● | ● | ||
24 | Exemption – Individuals sentenced for an offence | ● | ● | ● | ||
25 | Exemption – Safety of individuals | ● | ● | ● | ||
26 | Exemption– Information about another individual | ● | ● | ● | ||
27 | Exemption – Solicitor-client privilege | ● | ● | ● | ||
28 | Exemption – Medical record | ● | ● | ● | ||
31 | Notice of intention to investigate | ● | ● | |||
35(1) | Findings and recommendations of Privacy Commissioner (complaints) | ● | ● | ● | ||
35(4) | Access to be given | ● | ● | |||
36(3) | Reportof findings and recommendations (exempt banks) | ● | ● | |||
37(3) | Report of findings and recommendations (compliance review) | ● | ● | |||
51(2)(b) | Special rules for hearings | ● | ● | |||
51(3) | Ex parte representations | ● | ● | |||
72(1) | Annual report to Parliament | ● | ● |
Section/ Article | Action | Deputy Minister & Associate Deputy Minister | Assistant Deputy Minister – National Security | Assistant Deputy Ministers, Chief Audit Executive, Director General Communications | ATIP Manager | Senior ATIP Advisors & ATIP Analysts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9 | Reasonable facilities and time provided to examine personal information | ● | ● | |||
11(2) | Notification that correction to personal information has been made | ● | ● | |||
11(4) | Notification that correction to personal information has been refused | ● | ● | |||
13(1) | Disclosure of personal information relating to physical or mental health may be made toa qualified medical practitioner or psychologist for an opinion on whether to release information to the requester | ● | ● | |||
14 | Disclosure of personal information relating to physical ormental health may be made to a requester in the presence of a qualified medical practitioner or psychologist | ● | ● |
Appendix B – Statistical Report for 2011-2012 on the Privacy Act
Name of institution: Public Safety Canada
Reporting period: 01/04/2011 to 31/03/2012
Part 1 – Requests under the Privacy Act
Number of Requests | |
---|---|
Received during reporting period | 55 |
Outstanding from previous reporting period | 3 |
Total | 58 |
Closed during reporting period | 55 |
Carried over to next reporting period | 3 |
Part 2 – Requests closed during the reporting period
Disposition of requests | Completion Time | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 to 15 days | 16 to 30 days | 31 to 60 days | 61 to 120 days | 121 to 180 days | 181 to 365 days | More than 365 days | Total | |
All disclosed | 5 | 1 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 |
Disclosed in part | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No records exist | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Request abandoned | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Total | 15 | 4 | 33 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 55 |
Section | Number of requests |
---|---|
18(2) | 0 |
19(1)(a) | 1 |
19(1)(b) | 0 |
19(1)(c) | 0 |
19(1)(d) | 0 |
19(1)(e) | 0 |
19(1)(f) | 0 |
20 | 0 |
21 | 0 |
22(1)(a)(i) | 1 |
22(1)(a)(ii) | 0 |
22(1)(a)(iii) | 0 |
22(1)(b) | 1 |
22(1)(c) | 0 |
22(2) | 0 |
22.1 | 0 |
22.2 | 0 |
22.3 | 0 |
23(a) | 0 |
23(b) | 0 |
24(a) | 0 |
24(b) | 0 |
25 | 0 |
26 | 7 |
27 | 1 |
28 | 0 |
Section | Number of requests |
---|---|
69(1)(a) | 0 |
69(1)(b) | 0 |
69.1 | 0 |
70(1)(a) | 0 |
70(1)(b) | 0 |
70(1)(c) | 0 |
70(1)(d) | 0 |
70(1)(e) | 0 |
70(1)(f) | 0 |
70.1 | 0 |
Disposition | Paper | Electronic | Other formats |
---|---|---|---|
All disclosed | 39 | 0 | 0 |
Disclosed in part | 6 | 1 | 0 |
Total | 45 | 1 | 0 |
2.5 Complexity
Disposition of requests | Number of pages processed | Number of pages disclosed | Number of requests |
---|---|---|---|
All disclosed | 719 | 468 | 39 |
Disclosed in part | 3814 | 2868 | 7 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Request abandoned | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Disposition | Less than 100 pages processed | 101-500 pages processed | 501-1000 pages processed | 1001-5000 pages processed | More than 5000 pages processed | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Requests | Pages disclosed | Number of Requests | Pages disclosed | Number of Requests | Pages disclosed | Number of Requests | Pages disclosed | Number of Requests | Pages disclosed | |
All disclosed | 36 | 83 | 3 | 385 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Disclosed in part | 2 | 41 | 1 | 150 | 3 | 1595 | 1 | 1082 | 0 | 0 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Abandoned | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Disposition | Consultation required | Legal Advice Sought | Interwoven Information | Other | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All disclosed | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Disclosed in part | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Abandoned | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
2.6 Deemed refusals
Number of requests closed past the statutory deadline | Principal Reason | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Workload | External consultation | Internal consultation | Other | |
3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Number of days past deadline | Number of requests past deadline where no extension was taken | Number of requests past deadline where an extension was taken | Total |
---|---|---|---|
1 to 15 days | 0 | 2 | 2 |
16 to 30 days | 0 | 0 | 0 |
31 to 60 days | 0 | 0 | 0 |
61 to 120 days | 0 | 1 | 1 |
121 to 180 days | 0 | 0 | 0 |
181 to 365 days | 0 | 0 | 0 |
More than 365 days | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Translation Requests | Accepted | Refused | Total |
---|---|---|---|
English to French | 0 | 0 | 0 |
French to English | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Part 3 – Disclosures under subsection 8(2)
Paragraph 8(2)(e) | Paragraph 8(2)(m) | Total |
---|---|---|
0 | 2 | 2 |
Part 4 – Requests for correction of personal information and notations
Number | |
---|---|
Requests for correction received | 0 |
Requests for correction accepted | 0 |
Requests for correction refused | 0 |
Notations attached | 0 |
Part 5 – Extensions
Disposition of requests where an extension was taken | 15(a)(i) Interference with operations | 15(a)(ii) Consultation | 15(b) Translation or conversion | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Section 70 | Other | |||
All disclosed | 0 | 0 | 33 | 0 |
Disclosed in part | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No records exist | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Request abandoned | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 2 | 0 | 34 | 0 |
Length of extensions | 15(a)(i) Interference with operations | 15(a)(ii) Consultation | 15(b) Translation purposes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Section 70 | Other | |||
1 to 15 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
16 to 30 days | 2 | 0 | 34 | 0 |
Total | 2 | 0 | 34 | 0 |
Part 6 – Consultations received from other institutions and organizations
Consultations | Other government institutions | Number of pages to review | Other organizations | Number of pages to review |
---|---|---|---|---|
Received during the reporting period | 21 | 289 | 0 | 0 |
Outstanding from the previous reporting period | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 21 | 289 | 0 | 0 |
Closed during the reporting period | 20 | 286 | 0 | 0 |
Pending at the end of the reporting period | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Recommendation | Number of days required to complete consultation requests | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 to 15 days | 16 to 30 days | 31 to 60 days | 61 to 120 days | 121 to 180 days | 181 to 365 days | than 365 days | Total | |
Disclose entirely | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
Disclose in part | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Exempt entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exclude entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Consult other institution | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
Recommendation | Number of days required to complete consultation requests | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 to 15 days | 16 to 30 days | 31 to 60 days | 61 to 120 days | 121 to 180 days | 181 to 365 days | than 365 days | Total | |
Disclose entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Disclose in part | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exempt entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exclude entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Consult other institution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Part 7 – Completion time of consultations on Cabinet confidences
Number of days | Number of responses received | Number of responses received past deadline |
---|---|---|
1 to 15 | 0 | 0 |
16 to 30 | 0 | 0 |
31 to 60 | 0 | 0 |
61 to 120 | 0 | 0 |
121 to 180 | 0 | 0 |
181 to 365 | 0 | 0 |
More than 365 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 |
Part 8 – Resources related to the Privacy Act
Expenditures | Amount | |
---|---|---|
Salaries | $50,116 | |
Overtime | $0 | |
Goods and Services | $2,452 | |
• Contracts for privacy impact assessments | $0 | |
• Professional services contracts | $0 | |
• Other | $2,452 | |
Total | $52,568 |
Resources | Dedicated full-time | Dedicated part-time | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Full-time employees | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Part-time and casual employees | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Regional staff | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Consultants and agency personnel | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Students | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Additional Reporting Requirements
Indicate the number of:
- Privacy Impact Assessments initiated - 5
- Privacy Impact Assessments completed - 1
- Date modified: