Note
Author affiliated with Cooper, Sandler & West.
"IN THE MATTER OF Order in Council 1662/2003, dated November 12, 2003;
AND IN THE MATTER OF a Commission of Inquiry pursuant to the Public
Inquiries Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.41, as amended;
AND IN THE MATTER OF an Inquiry into the events surrounding the death of
Dudley George and the development of recommendations directed to the
avoidance of violence in similar circumstances."
"Parties' Closing Written Submissions (Part 2)"--Ipperwash Inquiry website.
The original document was published on the public website of the Government of Ontario. © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2006. Reproduced with permission.
Résumé
The OPP Reply is divided into Parts I and II. This is similar to the approach taken in our original submissions. Since the OPP Reply is designed to respond, where necessary, to the submissions made by other parties, it has been organized into Sections, each of which addresses the submissions made by a particular party to the Inquiry. As a result, where another party has made both Part I and Part II submissions, their submissions may be addressed in two locations. Often more than one party argued the same point in their Part I Submissions. The point is addressed in the OPP Part I Reply once, and not referred to again unless it is necessary to address some related or subsumed point. As is later explained, a different approach is taken in the OPP Part II Reply.