Catalogue de la bibliothèque

Mon panier

Reply on behalf of the Ontario Provincial Police and its senior officers : part II / Mark J. Sandler.

Cette page Web a été archivée dans le Web

L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous.

Localisation

Recherches policières canadienne

Ressource

Livres électroniques

Titre alternatif

Reply submissions on behalf of the Ontario Provincial Police and its senior officers : part I.

Auteurs

Publié

Bibliographie

Includes bibliographical references.

Description

1 online resource (151 pages)

Note

Author affiliated with Cooper, Sandler & West.
"IN THE MATTER OF Order in Council 1662/2003, dated November 12, 2003; AND IN THE MATTER OF a Commission of Inquiry pursuant to the Public Inquiries Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.41, as amended; AND IN THE MATTER OF an Inquiry into the events surrounding the death of Dudley George and the development of recommendations directed to the avoidance of violence in similar circumstances."
"Parties' Closing Written Submissions (Part 2)"--Ipperwash Inquiry website.
The original document was published on the public website of the Government of Ontario. © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2006. Reproduced with permission.

Résumé

The OPP Part II Reply follows. As indicated in the Overview to Part I, this Reply is organized into Sections, each of which addresses the submissions made by a particular party to the Inquiry. The Reply is organized to address, first, the submissions by Part II parties (in the order in which they will present oral submissions), and second, the submissions by the other parties. Some of the Part II recommendations made by parties to the Inquiry are similar to those made by other parties. The OPP has reproduced its response in each of the Sections devoted to those parties. Naturally, this means that the OPP Part II Reply contains some duplication. However, it was felt, on balance, that this approach would assist the Inquiry and the parties in identifying the OPP’s response to each of the parties’ recommendations, without having to constantly refer back to other Sections of the Reply.

Sujet

Accès en ligne

Date de modification :